First, let me tell you about Bailey. When I adopted Bailey I was working at a training/breeding field Lab kennel. He quickly learned from the other dogs that the orange retrieving bumpers (used to train bird dogs) were extremely cool. Bailey became positively crazy for the things. When we lived across the street from a park, we went over and played fetch with them nearly every day. When we went over to my parents' house, my dad would throw bumpers as far as his arm could fling them and Bailey would run after it at break-neck speed. The running wasn't so much the problem - it was the stopping that worried me. I loved that Bailey was having such a great time, but I was always afraid he would blow a knee. I find we are exceptionally lucky all he ever really ended up with was a limp that lasted 1/2 a day here and there. Unfortunately, in my opinion, we still did do some joint damage.
|Bailey with his bumper|
As of late, I have seen a fair amount of research about Unilateral Hip Dysplasia. All this means is that only one hip is displaced from the socket while the other is normal. There are many opinions on the topic, but one of them is that unilateral hip dysplasia doesn't just "happen", it is made - usually by injury. The idea is that if hip dysplasia is genetic, both hips will be effected, but if only one hip is displaced it likely is the result of an outside cause. Some studies have been done showing that better hip health is achieved in puppies who are exercised freely (under their own power and motivation) for greater portions of the day as opposed to puppies who are crated and then encouraged to burn off their excess energy quickly via things such as dodge and dart games. The pounding caused by games like "fetch" and the stress on joints from sudden stopping can have a lasting effect on joint health. I find that to be a pretty substantial cause for concern. I also think it makes perfect sense.
I can't tell you how much of it is a result of our games of fetch, but I can tell you that Bailey suffers from joint pain. I certainly have to wonder if the times he was so out-of-his-mind-excited to get the bumper that he launched himself of my parents deck from the top step, or even just the regular games of fetch, didn't have something to do with the way he hobbles around today. It's a terrible feeling, wondering if something you did lead to your dog's pain, even if you had no idea you were doing anything wrong at the time.
As Bailey got older, and I got more afraid he would hurt his knees, we began playing our game a little differently. I would take him out in my parents' back yard and hand him the bumper instead of throwing it, and play chase with him at a more moderate speed. He would run "victory laps" around the yard while I pretended to stalk him. (he had a pretty good recall and would come if I asked him to so this wasn't really the bad form of keep away where I wasn't in control and he thought he was getting away with something) Another thing we did is play fetch in the water - I would stand at the edge of the water and toss it back in for him to fetch. If anything, water retrieving is some of the best exercise you can give your dog, you just have to be very attentive to his limitations if you have a dog who will keep trying to go after the ball even if he is totally exhausted. These alternate forms of the game were significantly better for his hips and seemed to be just as fun for him.I can't help but wonder what might have been if I had always played this way. I don't wallow in guilt about it - what's done is done - but I absolutely have changed the way I handle my dogs as a result of my experiences with him and with the information I have gathered.
|Mendel enjoys Bailey's bumpers, only more for the rope than for the fetching.|
This sort of relates to the reason I am on the fence about having Lilly do agility, as well. Her front end is very straight and that means that every time she jumps those front joints take a beating (a well angulated front can cushion the blow and take stress off the joints). It is my hope that I will be able to find a place where we can use agility equipment without being criticized and I can either remove the bars for the jumps or put them on "chihuahua height" so she doesn't pound her front and hurt herself. I likely will never compete with her because the pounding she would take during practice simply wouldn't justify it. I do, however, think that we might be able to do some slowpoke agility where she practices on mostly lower jumps and just does her jump height for competition, I guess we'll see when the time comes. Read more about structure and why it's important here.
There is a fine line between allowing our dogs to be dogs (which I think is exceptionally important), making sure they have fun in play, and keeping them safe and healthy. It's a line that, unfortunately, I don't think can always be effectively walked. Sometimes we just have to do the best we can and spend equal amounts of time on each side. A reasonable argument for the purchase of healthy, well bred, purebred dogs can certainly be made. I won't have to be nearly as careful about what I do with Mendel as I do with Lilly (or probably should have with Bailey). Mendel is put together correctly, his body is built for work and athleticism, and he will have the proper nature-given growth hormones he should have throughout his entire life. (This certainly doesn't mean I don't have to be smart about things such as not allowing him to jump off beds and couches while his joints are still just developing) I love my rescue dogs with all my heart and a piece of me would like to always have one in my home, it's just something to think about when we make these decisions.
Fact is, now that I have an intact dog in the house, I'm pretty much out of the running for most rescues anyway. THIS is something I find to be terribly sad. Let me explain why:
I will absolutely never spay or neuter a dog before 2 years of age ever again. More likely, I will never spay or neuter one of my dogs at all if I don't have to in the future. Just as injury can lead to potential joint damage, so can removal of important growth hormones. An astounding number of studies are coming to light completely refuting much of what we thought we knew about neutering. When important growth hormones are removed at a young age, strange things start to happen - bones grow longer (because those missing hormones were responsible for closing growth plates at the appropriate times), parts of the body never fully develop, and the risk of some cancers are actually increased (instead of decreased as we once thought). When bones grow longer, proportions change and risk of torn knee ligaments can be increased (among other things). This is something to keep in mind especially for canine athletes - it is important that their bodies fully develop as nature intended in order for them to perform at a high level without injuring themselves. Often people think that since they are only going to do agility with their dogs, they don't need one of those "fancy show dogs". The fact is, those fancy show dogs are quite often bred specifically for correct proportions (this is certainly not always the case, you MUST do your research) and that means the well bred ones are going to be your best bet for a performance sports - as long as you commit to allowing them to develop as their breeder intended. Many of the show breeders *I* work with have a requirement written right into their contracts that the dog is not to be spayed or neutered until 2 years of age. On the other hand, the "working dog" breeders *I* know personally don't know a damn thing about correct proportions, joint angulation, or about the physiology of a canine athlete, which I find is terribly unfortunate. Find out more (and check out some of the studies on the health effects of spay/neuter) here and here and especially here.
Certainly, pet owners need to decide for themselves whether they are truly capable of handling an intact dog. There is no doubt many are not. I do find it very interesting how different the "norm" is in the US vs Europe (I really don't know for sure what the climate is like as far as neutering in Canada).
If you asked people who have lost a dog to bone cancer, would they say they would have chosen not to neuter their dog if they had been given all the facts? I don't know. I don't know if we really can know. I do think that most people would say they at least wish they had been given ALL the facts... told the truth.
I am not against neutering. I think it's necessary in the case of shelter pets (with a few exceptions) upon sale to new owners. I do, however, have a very big problem with the effort to push mandatory spay/neuter laws, and I also generally have a problem with spay/neuter campaigns because they do not offer up ALL the facts. If you're trying to educate people, you owe them the whole truth - not just what you want them to hear.
I think it is also very important to recognize that often times many of the problems associated with spay/neuter can be prevented simply by waiting until a dog is sexually mature to do it.
I'm not writing this to make anybody feel guilty or to suggest that my way is the right way. It's simply the conclusions I have come to as far as the care of my dogs and hopefully an encouragement for people to do their own research that will inform their own decisions. Just as the title says, The more we know...